🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."